User talk:Startreknerd11011011

I think this part:

the main problem was that enterprise could not have existed, the enterprise-D was refered to as the 5th ship to carry the name enterprise,

1) enterprise (entire of original series & animated series)

2) enterprise-A (end of star trek 4 and entire of star trek 5 & 6)

3) enterprise-B (start of generations)

4) enterprise-C (one episode of The Next Generation [Yesterdays enterprise])

5) enterprise-D (entire of The Next generation and entire of Generations.)

it was as bad an idea as resident evil zero

would be better in the main Star Trek: Enterprise article -- perhaps as an addenda to the "Continuity? What Continuity?" section.

--DreadPirateRobert 13:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Solo's Parsecs

ha! Good one. --DreadPirateRobert 14:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)