The English-to-Trektard Dictionary

From Imperial Wiki
Revision as of 01:11, 9 December 2007 by Zablorg (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fanatical trektards speak a different language than the rest of society. To aid members of the general population who might be big enough gluttons for punishment to want to understand them, we present this helpful translation guide:


A

Affect
Completely obliterate everything within the stated radius.


B

Biased
Warsie who won't let me get away with my trektard bullshit


C

Capture
see ‘Affect’
Censorship
daring to enforce the forum rules of SD.net. The trektard posts stupid, unsuppoted claims, commits numrous other rule violations and subsequently gets banned. He then whines on any other forum that will tolerate him about how SD.net won't tolerate his "alternative non-pro-wars" views
Collapsing buildings
all thats needed for a BDZ to turn a planet's surface to slag

D

Death Threat
any 100% fictional story written by a warsie that includes bodily harm to one or more of the characters even if none of them actually die
Destroy
completely vaporize due 100% to the energy of the impacting weapon, even if the target is known to contain components that are known to be highly explosive, and even if debris can clearly be seen flying away from the explosion.
Direct quoting
horrible misrepresentation
Discard evidence
show that the Trekkie’s assumptions regarding said evidence are bullshit.

E

Education
  1. Time served.
  2. Something that can be acquired through google searching
  3. Something not applicable/needed for debate
Emotional investment
being proud of one's academic accomplishments when the trektard things one should be ashamed of them and hide them under a rock, rather than using them to show just how far above the trekkie he is.
Enemy is no longer firing
enemy gunnery crew has been completely exterminated .
Evidence
Something that does not matter in a debate about things based in fiction.

F

Forget
Not reading the Trekkie’s responses to other posters.

I

Ignore
See 'forget'
Ignore Evidence and/or Canon
  1. Not make the same wanked assumptions about said evidence the Trektard would.
  2. Not interpret a statement literally, even when said statement makes absolutely zero sense.
Invasion
Ten or fewer members of a rival board of thousands come to embarrass me on my cum-covered VS thread. Even if some of them are regular members.

L

Legal threat
daring to mention to a trektard that their committing libel against one of their debate opponents might result in legal trouble in real life.
Lie
something only warsies do


M

Molten Slag
almost melted planetary surface

N

Not focus on (a particular issue)
not show any evidence regarding said issue at all


O

Override
not mention at all. (note, in SW, there is a hierarchy to deal with explicit contradictions in canon material. Many trektards (Andrew Joshua Talon, Husker (DM) Jay) try and claim this applies to topics the higher canon is completely silent on. In other words, if the C- or S- canon mentions a particular capability and the films say nothing about it, the Trektards interpret said silence as a contradiction.)

S

Stationary
does NOT imply that a starship is not actually moving.
Suckered
grow up, face reality and get an education; to let go of the wishful thinking of ignorance
Suspension of disbelief
the warsie thinks Star Wars actually is real. Note that Trektards making such accusations are often the same people running around claiming Star Trek is completely realistic and predicted and/or is responsible for technological innovations like cell phones.

U

Universal
selective quotations of a source. (Example: JMSpock attempts to use the half-dozen categories listed in the "SW vs ST in Five Minutes"[1] essay to prove Mike thinks the Empire has universal advantage over the Star Trek universe

V

Variable
so thoroughly consistent that a reliable time estimate can be generated

References