Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shields"

Latest revision as of 20:36, 8 February 2008

We'll need separate articles for Star Wars shield technology and Star Trek shield technology. An article with just the name "Shields" should reference both specific articles. - Mad 22:17, 6 November 2007 (EST)
- Absolutely: ideally someone could compress the general principles from the main site (http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tech/Shields/index.html) and link the factional specific articles (descriptions/capabities) from here. --Stark 18:45, 7 November 2007 (EST)

"Force field" is the correct spelling. Or, at least, it's much more popular. Mad 15:32, 8 February 2008 (EST)

If you want to go through all the articles that contain "forcefield" and change them, be my guest. Darth Servo 15:36, 8 February 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 20:35, 8 February 2008 (view source) Darth Servo (talk \| contribs) (→‎"Force Field" vs "Forcefield") ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 20:36, 8 February 2008 (view source) Darth Servo (talk \| contribs) (→‎"Force Field" vs "Forcefield")
Line 6:		Line 6:
	: "Force field" is the correct spelling. Or, at least, it's much more popular. [[User:Mad\|Mad]] 15:32, 8 February 2008 (EST)		: "Force field" is the correct spelling. Or, at least, it's much more popular. [[User:Mad\|Mad]] 15:32, 8 February 2008 (EST)

	: If you want to go through all the articles that contain "forcefield" and change them, be my guest.		: If you want to go through all the articles that contain "forcefield" and change them, be my guest. [[User:Darth Servo\|Darth Servo]] 15:36, 8 February 2008 (EST)