Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shields"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
("force field" is the correct spelling) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* We'll need separate articles for Star Wars shield technology and Star Trek shield technology. An article with just the name "Shields" should reference both specific articles. - [[User:Mad|Mad]] 22:17, 6 November 2007 (EST) | * We'll need separate articles for Star Wars shield technology and Star Trek shield technology. An article with just the name "Shields" should reference both specific articles. - [[User:Mad|Mad]] 22:17, 6 November 2007 (EST) | ||
**Absolutely: ideally someone could compress the general principles from the main site (http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tech/Shields/index.html) and link the factional specific articles (descriptions/capabities) from here. --[[User:Stark|Stark]] 18:45, 7 November 2007 (EST) | **Absolutely: ideally someone could compress the general principles from the main site (http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tech/Shields/index.html) and link the factional specific articles (descriptions/capabities) from here. --[[User:Stark|Stark]] 18:45, 7 November 2007 (EST) | ||
== "Force Field" vs "Forcefield" == | |||
: "Force field" is the correct spelling. Or, at least, it's much more popular. | |||
Revision as of 20:28, 8 February 2008
Article Naming
- We'll need separate articles for Star Wars shield technology and Star Trek shield technology. An article with just the name "Shields" should reference both specific articles. - Mad 22:17, 6 November 2007 (EST)
- Absolutely: ideally someone could compress the general principles from the main site (http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tech/Shields/index.html) and link the factional specific articles (descriptions/capabities) from here. --Stark 18:45, 7 November 2007 (EST)
"Force Field" vs "Forcefield"
- "Force field" is the correct spelling. Or, at least, it's much more popular.