Difference between revisions of "Appearance over performance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: A versus debating flaw that basically amounts to "Star Trek technology is sleeker and more futuristic, while Star Wars technology is bulky and crude. Therefore Trek's technology is mor...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A [[versus]] debating flaw that basically amounts to "Star Trek technology is sleeker and more futuristic, while Star Wars technology is bulky and crude. Therefore Trek's technology is more advanced." | A [[versus]] debating flaw that basically amounts to "Star Trek technology is sleeker and more futuristic, while Star Wars technology is bulky and crude. Therefore Trek's technology is more advanced." | ||
It's a flaw because something's external appearance has nothing to do with its performance. | It's a flaw because something's external appearance has nothing to do with its performance. For example, a luxury yacht is sleek and beautiful, while an aircraft carrier is big and blocky. Yet any battle between them would end with the carrier victorious. | ||
[[Category:Debate]] | [[Category:Debate]] | ||
Revision as of 19:19, 24 January 2008
A versus debating flaw that basically amounts to "Star Trek technology is sleeker and more futuristic, while Star Wars technology is bulky and crude. Therefore Trek's technology is more advanced."
It's a flaw because something's external appearance has nothing to do with its performance. For example, a luxury yacht is sleek and beautiful, while an aircraft carrier is big and blocky. Yet any battle between them would end with the carrier victorious.