Difference between revisions of "AVOGARDO"

From Imperial Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Banned from SD.net, now believed to be posting at Starfleetjedi under the screen name of 'Who is like God arbour' Category:Trolls Category:SDN Trolls)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Banned from SD.net, now believed to be posting at Starfleetjedi under the screen name of 'Who is like God arbour'
Banned from SD.net, now believed to be posting at Starfleetjedi under the screen name of 'Who is like God arbour'
Claims to be a laywer in Germany and that somehow this makes him a science expert.
Appeals to "holes" in out understanding of gravity in order to justify making up what ever bullshit he wants. Further appeals to possible future "paradigm shifts" to insist all of his nonsense is perfectly legitimate.
== Greatest Hits ==
[http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=101977 [AVOGARDO] Moron boy's ignorant ravings]
From his introductory post at StarfleetJedi forums:
''I have worked at a District Court and have conduct trials. I was court representative for the Public Prosecutor's Department. I have to understand scientifical expertises and have to base my ruling on these. I think, I know, how to debate and analyse evidences.''


[[Category:Trolls]]
[[Category:Trolls]]
[[Category:SDN Trolls]]
[[Category:SDN Trolls]]

Revision as of 22:56, 12 December 2007

Banned from SD.net, now believed to be posting at Starfleetjedi under the screen name of 'Who is like God arbour'

Claims to be a laywer in Germany and that somehow this makes him a science expert.

Appeals to "holes" in out understanding of gravity in order to justify making up what ever bullshit he wants. Further appeals to possible future "paradigm shifts" to insist all of his nonsense is perfectly legitimate.

Greatest Hits

[AVOGARDO Moron boy's ignorant ravings]

From his introductory post at StarfleetJedi forums: I have worked at a District Court and have conduct trials. I was court representative for the Public Prosecutor's Department. I have to understand scientifical expertises and have to base my ruling on these. I think, I know, how to debate and analyse evidences.