Difference between revisions of "Talk:Omni-tool"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Mass Effect is often dismissed as primitive by Star Trek standards, but does Star Trek have a device that combines the functions of a [[communicator]], [[tricorder]], and [[replicator]] in a package small enough to easily implant under your skin? --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 13:26, 14 February 2013 (EST) | Mass Effect is often dismissed as primitive by Star Trek standards, but does Star Trek have a device that combines the functions of a [[communicator]], [[tricorder]], and [[replicator]] in a package small enough to easily implant under your skin? --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 13:26, 14 February 2013 (EST) | ||
* And, oh yeah, guided energy weapon. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 15:04, 8 October 2013 (EDT) | * And, oh yeah, guided energy weapon. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 15:04, 8 October 2013 (EDT) | ||
* Tricorders and replicators are better at their functions than omnitools, though. But yeah, as far as miniaturization goes the omnitool is hard to beat. [[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] 01:42, 22 October 2013 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:42, 22 October 2013
Mass Effect is often dismissed as primitive by Star Trek standards, but does Star Trek have a device that combines the functions of a communicator, tricorder, and replicator in a package small enough to easily implant under your skin? --Ted C 13:26, 14 February 2013 (EST)