Difference between revisions of "User:Ahurazithramis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
--[[User:DreadPirateRobert|DreadPirateRobert]] 16:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC) | --[[User:DreadPirateRobert|DreadPirateRobert]] 16:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Actually, I prefer Picard.... Extremely active for a 50 year old, let alone a 70 year old, even if it is the future. New Trilogy, if that means TNG, DS9 and Voyager. And..... I have no clue how many Constitution class starships could destroy a Star Destroyer. I usually don't do calcs... but I think that 4 Defiants could take a Star Destroyer if the very best of Star Fleet crews were in them. On average... who can say... even one hundred might not be enough under even optimal circumstances. | |||
Latest revision as of 03:11, 18 October 2008
"Darwin is dead and Jesus lives!"
I joined the wiki just to record what I proudly said, unapologetically.
- Hello, Ahurazithramis. I personally believe that Christ is risen from the dead, uniting God and Man and opening the way to paradise for the human race. (I also believe that the Earth is over a million years old.) I've never mentioned that here, though, since the topic is Star Wars, Star Trek, and occasionally Stargate and other SF. So, do you prefer Kirk or Picard? What about Original Trilogy versus New Trilogy? How many Constitution-Class starships would it take to damage a Star Destroyer?
--DreadPirateRobert 16:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I prefer Picard.... Extremely active for a 50 year old, let alone a 70 year old, even if it is the future. New Trilogy, if that means TNG, DS9 and Voyager. And..... I have no clue how many Constitution class starships could destroy a Star Destroyer. I usually don't do calcs... but I think that 4 Defiants could take a Star Destroyer if the very best of Star Fleet crews were in them. On average... who can say... even one hundred might not be enough under even optimal circumstances.