Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ted C"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Coming from me I don't know if you'll take it as more of a compliment or an insult; but nevertheless I just wanted to say I'm really impressed by the quality and quantity of your edits. The wiki really wouldn't have been the same without you, thank you! --[[User:BountyHunterSAx|BountyHunterSAx]] 12:55, 17 February 2008 (EST) | Coming from me I don't know if you'll take it as more of a compliment or an insult; but nevertheless I just wanted to say I'm really impressed by the quality and quantity of your edits. The wiki really wouldn't have been the same without you, thank you! --[[User:BountyHunterSAx|BountyHunterSAx]] 12:55, 17 February 2008 (EST) | ||
*Thank you. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 08:40, 18 February 2008 (EST) | *Thank you. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 08:40, 18 February 2008 (EST) | ||
RE: New pages - Only 4 of them doubled up - the Venator, the ISD, the Executor, and the Dreadnaught. And I chose to create new pages so that they had the full name. With the exception of the Venator page, then copy-pasted the other info over (I missed that one last night). The ISD one was certainly justified, as the pages thee are weird double pages one of which smashes the mk 1 & mk 2 together, and another that lists a number of different kind of ISD with vague details about all of them. I'd take the position that between the two of them, having the full name is superior. [[User:Ender|Ender]] 17:34, 28 May 2008 (EDT) | |||
==Testing== | ==Testing== | ||
Revision as of 21:34, 28 May 2008
Coming from me I don't know if you'll take it as more of a compliment or an insult; but nevertheless I just wanted to say I'm really impressed by the quality and quantity of your edits. The wiki really wouldn't have been the same without you, thank you! --BountyHunterSAx 12:55, 17 February 2008 (EST)
- Thank you. --Ted C 08:40, 18 February 2008 (EST)
RE: New pages - Only 4 of them doubled up - the Venator, the ISD, the Executor, and the Dreadnaught. And I chose to create new pages so that they had the full name. With the exception of the Venator page, then copy-pasted the other info over (I missed that one last night). The ISD one was certainly justified, as the pages thee are weird double pages one of which smashes the mk 1 & mk 2 together, and another that lists a number of different kind of ISD with vague details about all of them. I'd take the position that between the two of them, having the full name is superior. Ender 17:34, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
Testing
Comment on ST weapons range and accuracy edit. Under the Yesterday's Enterprise heading: "there is political reason to delay firing, since..." Should that be "no political reason to delay" or am I missing something?--Darth Servo 13:46, 27 February 2008 (EST)
- No, you found a typo. --Ted C 14:45, 27 February 2008 (EST)
Table setup test
| column 1 | column 2 | column 3 | column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| cell 1 | cell 2 | cell 3 | cell 4 |
| cell 1 | cell 2 | cell 3 | cell 4 |