Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Sites"

Latest revision as of 15:52, 19 December 2007

Would it be acceptable to put down pages for SFJ and RSA's site? --Coiler1 15:29, 18 December 2007 (EST)

I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be. You can explain just what kind of crack-pottery visitors to those sites can expect to find. --Ted C 10:52, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 20:29, 18 December 2007 (view source) Coiler1 (talk \| contribs) (New page: Would it be acceptable to put down pages for SFJ and RSA's site? --~~~~)		Latest revision as of 15:52, 19 December 2007 (view source) Ted C (talk \| contribs)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Would it be acceptable to put down pages for SFJ and RSA's site? --[[User:Coiler1\|Coiler1]] 15:29, 18 December 2007 (EST)		Would it be acceptable to put down pages for SFJ and RSA's site? --[[User:Coiler1\|Coiler1]] 15:29, 18 December 2007 (EST)
			* I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be. You can explain just what kind of crack-pottery visitors to those sites can expect to find. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:52, 19 December 2007 (EST)