Talk:Away team

Perhaps the factual information (incidents, equipment) and analysis (especially the "Age of Sail" stuff) in the article should be separated? It's hard to see what comes from the series and what comes from Brian's head--Bounty 15:08, 14 November 2007 (EST)

• A lot of this stuff is stuff discussed before on SDN, especially the Age of Sail analogy in TOS. If you don't want it here, fine, or if you want references to specific threads or more specific examples, fine, but there's more a wiki than just stating the facts. Interpretation of data is vitally important, rather than just throwing out random trivia or factoids to be memorized, if the wiki's going to live -- Brian.

• • Analysis is great, but mark it as such. Make a new header or something. Right now the article's just cluttered --Bounty 16:02, 14 November 2007 (EST)

References would be nice. They can be added by:

• http://www.google.com (creates a numbered external link)
• <ref>http://www.google.com</ref> in the article with <references/> at the end of the article to "catch" the footnotes (if it doesn't exist).

- Mad 16:04, 14 November 2007 (EST)

• • Okay I added new headers to separate the analysis from the others and deleted the most speculative bullshit, especially the part telling the Federation how to do its job. I'll put in references in a little bit -- Brian.