Difference between revisions of "Talk:SW Shields"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Do we know enough about relativistic shields to lump them with the combat deflector shields this article talks about? I've left the text but moved it so that the difference is clearly defined. [[User:Mad|Mad]] 18:42, 7 November 2007 (EST) | * Do we know enough about relativistic shields to lump them with the combat deflector shields this article talks about? I've left the text but moved it so that the difference is clearly defined. [[User:Mad|Mad]] 18:42, 7 November 2007 (EST) | ||
**My understanding was that the time issue was dealt with through time technology, not 'relativistic shields'. That sounds like Voyager-style silliness, to me - is there a source? --[[User:Stark|Stark]] 19:21, 7 November 2007 (EST) | **My understanding was that the time issue was dealt with through time technology, not 'relativistic shields'. That sounds like Voyager-style silliness, to me - is there a source? --[[User:Stark|Stark]] 19:21, 7 November 2007 (EST) | ||
***The only place I know of that relativistic shielding was mentioned is at [http://www.holonetnews.com/48/life/13321_2.html one of LucasFilm's promotional HoloNet News articles]. - [[User:Mad|Mad]] 11:15, 8 November 2007 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:15, 8 November 2007
Relativistic Shields
- Do we know enough about relativistic shields to lump them with the combat deflector shields this article talks about? I've left the text but moved it so that the difference is clearly defined. Mad 18:42, 7 November 2007 (EST)
- My understanding was that the time issue was dealt with through time technology, not 'relativistic shields'. That sounds like Voyager-style silliness, to me - is there a source? --Stark 19:21, 7 November 2007 (EST)
- The only place I know of that relativistic shielding was mentioned is at one of LucasFilm's promotional HoloNet News articles. - Mad 11:15, 8 November 2007 (EST)
- My understanding was that the time issue was dealt with through time technology, not 'relativistic shields'. That sounds like Voyager-style silliness, to me - is there a source? --Stark 19:21, 7 November 2007 (EST)