Difference between revisions of "User talk:Startreknerd11011011"
(New page: I think this part: the main problem was that enterprise could not have existed, the enterprise-D was refered to as the 5th ship to carry the name enterprise, 1) enterprise (entire of ori...) |
(→Solo's Parsecs: new section) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
--DreadPirateRobert 13:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | --DreadPirateRobert 13:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Solo's Parsecs == | |||
ha! Good one. --[[User:DreadPirateRobert|DreadPirateRobert]] 14:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:55, 31 October 2008
I think this part:
the main problem was that enterprise could not have existed, the enterprise-D was refered to as the 5th ship to carry the name enterprise,
1) enterprise (entire of original series & animated series)
2) enterprise-A (end of star trek 4 and entire of star trek 5 & 6)
3) enterprise-B (start of generations)
4) enterprise-C (one episode of The Next Generation [Yesterdays enterprise])
5) enterprise-D (entire of The Next generation and entire of Generations.)
it was as bad an idea as resident evil zero
would be better in the main Star Trek: Enterprise article -- perhaps as an addenda to the "Continuity? What Continuity?" section.
--DreadPirateRobert 13:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Solo's Parsecs
ha! Good one. --DreadPirateRobert 14:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)