Difference between revisions of "Talk:One-post wonder"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: * Should masonwheeler be removed from the example list, as he now has a postcount of 3, or should the definition be updated to allow for more than one post, or perhaps 'one-topic-wonder' ?...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* Should masonwheeler be removed from the example list, as he now has a postcount of 3, or should the definition be updated to allow for more than one post, or perhaps 'one-topic-wonder' ?--[[User:BountyHunterSAx|BountyHunterSAx]] 00:34, 13 March 2008 (EDT) | * Should masonwheeler be removed from the example list, as he now has a postcount of 3, or should the definition be updated to allow for more than one post, or perhaps 'one-topic-wonder' ?--[[User:BountyHunterSAx|BountyHunterSAx]] 00:34, 13 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
** Possibly. If he doesn't have significantly more to say, we can probably keep him, though. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 13:37, 17 March 2008 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:37, 17 March 2008
- Should masonwheeler be removed from the example list, as he now has a postcount of 3, or should the definition be updated to allow for more than one post, or perhaps 'one-topic-wonder' ?--BountyHunterSAx 00:34, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
- Possibly. If he doesn't have significantly more to say, we can probably keep him, though. --Ted C 13:37, 17 March 2008 (EDT)