Difference between revisions of "Minimalism"

From Imperial Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Evacuations was spelled wrong.)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==What is Minimalism?==
'''Minimalism''' is the use of numbers that seem absurdly low for the situation/universe.  This is a common [[brain bug]], and one such example of minimalism run amok is is the so-called "3 million troopers" franchise decision in [[Star Wars]].  In a galaxy with at least a million worlds as part of the primary political entity, 3 million soldiers are entirely insufficient to fight a war on a pan-galactic scale.  Other examples include the 200 vessel '[[Katana fleet|Katana]]' fleet in the ''[[Thrawn]]'' Trilogy,  and the numbers provided for the majority of the battles during the [[Yuuzhan Vong]] invasion.
'''Minimalism''' is the use of numbers that seem absurdly low for the situation/universe.  This is a common brain-bug, and one such example of minimalism run amok is is the so-called "3 million troopers" franchise decision.  In a galaxy with at least a million worlds as part of the primary political entity, 3 million soldiers are entirely insufficient to fight a war on a pan-galactic scale.  Other examples include the 200 vessel '[[Katana fleet|Katana]]' fleet in the ''[[Thrawn]]'' Trilogy,  and the numbers provided for the majority of the battles during the [[Yuuzhan Vong]] invasion.


Star Wars isn't the only guilty franchise, though. 
==Why is this important?==
==Why is this important?==
While one could never call a space opera "realistic" certain things are expected.  Tens of millions of men and women were mobilized during WW2, and no matter the level of technology, a certain number of "boots on the ground" would be required for any successful occupation.
While one could never call a space opera "realistic" certain things are expected.  Tens of millions of men and women were mobilized during WW2, and no matter the level of technology, a certain number of "boots on the ground" would be required for any successful occupation.
For example, while an orbiting starship may be able to bombard the planetary government into submission, there may still be widespread partisan activity.  In addition, if the planet has economic resources (be they industrial or natural) it would be necessary to land troops and attempt to seize the facilities intact instead of risking destroying them from orbit.  All these things mean a large number of troops would be needed to fight planetary, inter-planetary, or intra-galactic conflicts.


==Why do EU authors prefer minimalist stories?==
==Why do EU authors prefer minimalist stories?==
In the decision to concentrate on a handful of characters in the SW franchise, most EU authors seemed to have opt to minimalize the importance of the greater universe.  After all, with trillions of people out there it's hard to argue that a smuggler and a farmboy(even if he is a Jedi) are the be-all, end-all to everything important that happens.   
In the decision to concentrate on a handful of characters in the SW franchise, most EU authors seem to have opted to minimize the importance of the greater universe.  After all, with trillions, possibly quadrillions, of people out there, it's hard to argue that a smuggler and a farmboy (even if he is a Jedi) are the be-all, end-all to everything important that happens.   
 
Alternatively, some authors may simply be unable to write to the numbers.  Most EU material has been written during the immediate Post-Cold War Era of Operation Desert Storm and the operations in the Balkans, and the common layperson has come to equate a high-tech military with a minimal amount of ground troops.  Whatever their talents as writers may be, most EU authors are laypeople who very rarely, if ever, give much thought to how the military really works.
 
Another possibility is that the author simply cannot conceive of the real implications of the mind-boggling scale of pan-galactic civilization, as evidenced by numbers up to a dozen orders of magnitude too low. Again, however talented they may otherwise be, most EU authors rarely give much thought to how a true pan-galactic civilization would really function.
 
A fourth possibility is simple hack writing, with the author throwing in a tiny force out of sheer laziness and declaring it a massive threat due to the perceived need to have everything occur on a galactic scale.
 
== Other Examples of Minimalism ==
*In [[Star Trek]], the [[Romulan]]s once attempted to invade [[Vulcan]] with a mere 2000 troops.
*The [[Imperial Space Marines]] of [[Warhammer 40,000]] are claimed to be able to conduct planetary-scale operations with just 1000 marines.
*In Battletech, the Clans launched an invasion against the thousands of worlds and trillions of the Inner Sphere with a force of less than 100,000 warriors.


Alternatively, some authors may be simply be unable to write to the numbers. Most EU material has been written during the immediate Post-Cold War Era of Operation Desert Storm and the operations in the Balkans, and the common layperson has come to equate high tech militaries with a minimal amount of ground troops.  Whatever their talents may be, most EU authors are laypeople who very rarely, if ever, give much thought as to how the military really works.
==External Links==
* [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SciFiWritersHaveNoSenseOfScale Science Fiction Writers have no Sense of Scale] is a TV Tropes wiki article which examines this [[brain bug]] and lists many examples.


==The Credentials of Karen Traviss==
[[Category: Science Fiction]]
Karen Traviss, an EU author known for her "Republic Commando" books, is among the worst offenders.  She in the past has attempted to present her previous job with the Royal Navy Auxiliary Service and the Territorial Army as credentials for why her outline of the force structure for the Grand Army of the Republic is acceptable from a military point of view.  The RNXS appears to have operated in a FEMA-like capacity for evacuations, and her description of her [http://www.strangehorizons.com/2006/20060327/traviss-int-a.shtml duties] indicates that she was a deck seaman.  In the United States Navy these are the least qualified personnel, not trusting even of being a cook.  She then served "Briefly" in the Territorial Army as a media specialist. As she did not serve in a signifigant capacity in a combat arms branch, her military credentials cannot be reasonably used to justify her proposed Grand Army of the Republic force structure.

Latest revision as of 07:06, 31 March 2010

Minimalism is the use of numbers that seem absurdly low for the situation/universe. This is a common brain bug, and one such example of minimalism run amok is is the so-called "3 million troopers" franchise decision in Star Wars. In a galaxy with at least a million worlds as part of the primary political entity, 3 million soldiers are entirely insufficient to fight a war on a pan-galactic scale. Other examples include the 200 vessel 'Katana' fleet in the Thrawn Trilogy, and the numbers provided for the majority of the battles during the Yuuzhan Vong invasion.

Star Wars isn't the only guilty franchise, though.

Why is this important?

While one could never call a space opera "realistic" certain things are expected. Tens of millions of men and women were mobilized during WW2, and no matter the level of technology, a certain number of "boots on the ground" would be required for any successful occupation.

For example, while an orbiting starship may be able to bombard the planetary government into submission, there may still be widespread partisan activity. In addition, if the planet has economic resources (be they industrial or natural) it would be necessary to land troops and attempt to seize the facilities intact instead of risking destroying them from orbit. All these things mean a large number of troops would be needed to fight planetary, inter-planetary, or intra-galactic conflicts.

Why do EU authors prefer minimalist stories?

In the decision to concentrate on a handful of characters in the SW franchise, most EU authors seem to have opted to minimize the importance of the greater universe. After all, with trillions, possibly quadrillions, of people out there, it's hard to argue that a smuggler and a farmboy (even if he is a Jedi) are the be-all, end-all to everything important that happens.

Alternatively, some authors may simply be unable to write to the numbers. Most EU material has been written during the immediate Post-Cold War Era of Operation Desert Storm and the operations in the Balkans, and the common layperson has come to equate a high-tech military with a minimal amount of ground troops. Whatever their talents as writers may be, most EU authors are laypeople who very rarely, if ever, give much thought to how the military really works.

Another possibility is that the author simply cannot conceive of the real implications of the mind-boggling scale of pan-galactic civilization, as evidenced by numbers up to a dozen orders of magnitude too low. Again, however talented they may otherwise be, most EU authors rarely give much thought to how a true pan-galactic civilization would really function.

A fourth possibility is simple hack writing, with the author throwing in a tiny force out of sheer laziness and declaring it a massive threat due to the perceived need to have everything occur on a galactic scale.

Other Examples of Minimalism

  • In Star Trek, the Romulans once attempted to invade Vulcan with a mere 2000 troops.
  • The Imperial Space Marines of Warhammer 40,000 are claimed to be able to conduct planetary-scale operations with just 1000 marines.
  • In Battletech, the Clans launched an invasion against the thousands of worlds and trillions of the Inner Sphere with a force of less than 100,000 warriors.

External Links