Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lightsabre"

From Imperial Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: == "Correct" Spelling? == Why should we use almost never-used "lightsabre" spelling when "lightsaber" is used everywhere except apparently very early draft scripts (and some entry in the ...)
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:


Why should we use almost never-used "lightsabre" spelling when "lightsaber" is used everywhere except apparently very early draft scripts (and some entry in the credits, IIRC)? I know Bob Brown had a page dedicated to the spelling, but that's down AFAIK and can't be used for a reference. - [[User:Mad|Mad]] 18:19, 5 December 2007 (EST)
Why should we use almost never-used "lightsabre" spelling when "lightsaber" is used everywhere except apparently very early draft scripts (and some entry in the credits, IIRC)? I know Bob Brown had a page dedicated to the spelling, but that's down AFAIK and can't be used for a reference. - [[User:Mad|Mad]] 18:19, 5 December 2007 (EST)
* Because, unless I'm mistaken, that is what George Lucas says is the correct spelling.  On the other hand, I looked it up on StarWars.com, and the article there spells it "lightsaber", so I guess it's a wash.  At least this way, there's now a redirect that will get a visitor to the page either way. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 23:29, 5 December 2007 (EST)

Latest revision as of 04:29, 6 December 2007

"Correct" Spelling?

Why should we use almost never-used "lightsabre" spelling when "lightsaber" is used everywhere except apparently very early draft scripts (and some entry in the credits, IIRC)? I know Bob Brown had a page dedicated to the spelling, but that's down AFAIK and can't be used for a reference. - Mad 18:19, 5 December 2007 (EST)

  • Because, unless I'm mistaken, that is what George Lucas says is the correct spelling. On the other hand, I looked it up on StarWars.com, and the article there spells it "lightsaber", so I guess it's a wash. At least this way, there's now a redirect that will get a visitor to the page either way. --Ted C 23:29, 5 December 2007 (EST)