Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amphibious assault"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I want to take the Siege of AR-558 back off of this page. There wasn't a resisted troop insertion there, but the Federation and Dominion forces were already on the surface. Also,...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I want to take the Siege of AR-558 back off of this page. There wasn't a resisted troop insertion there, but the Federation and Dominion forces were already on the surface. Also, there's no reason that transporters couldn't be used as part of a planetary assault; they just change the way that troops make it to the surface. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 07:18, 10 September 2013 (EDT) | I want to take the Siege of AR-558 back off of this page. There wasn't a resisted troop insertion there, but the Federation and Dominion forces were already on the surface. The only landing that occurred was Sisko beaming down to resupply the troops that were holding the communications center. Also, there's no reason that transporters couldn't be used as part of a planetary assault; they just change the way that troops make it to the surface. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 07:18, 10 September 2013 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:23, 10 September 2013
I want to take the Siege of AR-558 back off of this page. There wasn't a resisted troop insertion there, but the Federation and Dominion forces were already on the surface. The only landing that occurred was Sisko beaming down to resupply the troops that were holding the communications center. Also, there's no reason that transporters couldn't be used as part of a planetary assault; they just change the way that troops make it to the surface. --Ted C 07:18, 10 September 2013 (EDT)