Difference between revisions of "Talk:Death Star"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*If we look at the DS1 compared to the DS2 in terms of volume, the DS2 is roughly 177 times larger than the DS1. I don't know where this "twice the size" shit came from. Even the diameter is around 5 and a half times larger. Also, it didn't take the Empire 20 years to make the DS1, they had a lot of prototypes and research completed in that 20 years, so maybe we should change that. [[User: Lord Relvenous| Lord Relvenous]] | *If we look at the DS1 compared to the DS2 in terms of volume, the DS2 is roughly 177 times larger than the DS1. I don't know where this "twice the size" shit came from. Even the diameter is around 5 and a half times larger. Also, it didn't take the Empire 20 years to make the DS1, they had a lot of prototypes and research completed in that 20 years, so maybe we should change that. [[User: Lord Relvenous| Lord Relvenous]] | ||
**You're absolutely right, that section is legacy from SaX's wookie-ransacking. Be my guest if you want to re-write it. --[[User:Stark|Stark]] 05:24, 9 November 2007 (EST) | **You're absolutely right, that section is legacy from SaX's wookie-ransacking. Be my guest if you want to re-write it. --[[User:Stark|Stark]] 05:24, 9 November 2007 (EST) | ||
*rewrote the entry on the first Death Star. I used the Star Wars Databank as my main source. I don't really have time to write the entry on the DSII. I'll go back later and add sources and the rest of the entry. Lord Relvenous | *rewrote the entry on the first Death Star. I used the Star Wars Databank as my main source. I don't really have time to write the entry on the DSII. I'll go back later and add sources and the rest of the entry. [[Lord Relvenous]] | ||
Revision as of 00:01, 10 November 2007
Incorrect capitalisation is irritating. Where does 'HyperMatter' come from? :) It seems the consensus is that the different-looking station in ROTS isn't the DS1, also. --Stark 17:45, 7 November 2007 (EST)
It's the Confederacy's "Great Weapon" not the DS that is seen at the end of ROTS. http://www.theforce.net/swtc/ds/ruction.html#cgw
--Wild Karrde 22:51, 7 November 2007
- Can someone with the required EU knowledge edit the DS1 history section? With the Maw and all the prototypes etc there's a pretty good timeline, but I don't know what it is. And SAX, seriously, if you don't know what you're talking about, stop posting. The thing in ROTS wasn't the DS1, get over it. --Stark 18:48, 7 November 2007 (EST)
- Duly Noted. --BountyHunterSAx
- There's heaps of articles I'd like to put shit in, but I don't know enough (like this one, with the EU and Tarkins Eye and all that shit). :) Someone'll fill in the gaps later. --Stark 18:55, 7 November 2007 (EST)
- If we look at the DS1 compared to the DS2 in terms of volume, the DS2 is roughly 177 times larger than the DS1. I don't know where this "twice the size" shit came from. Even the diameter is around 5 and a half times larger. Also, it didn't take the Empire 20 years to make the DS1, they had a lot of prototypes and research completed in that 20 years, so maybe we should change that. Lord Relvenous
- You're absolutely right, that section is legacy from SaX's wookie-ransacking. Be my guest if you want to re-write it. --Stark 05:24, 9 November 2007 (EST)
- rewrote the entry on the first Death Star. I used the Star Wars Databank as my main source. I don't really have time to write the entry on the DSII. I'll go back later and add sources and the rest of the entry. Lord Relvenous