Difference between revisions of "Talk:StarfleetJedi Forums"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Can I put in an entry for l33telboi in here? --~~~~) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can I put in an entry for l33telboi in here? --[[User:Coiler1|Coiler1]] 09:51, 15 June 2008 (EDT) | Can I put in an entry for l33telboi in here? --[[User:Coiler1|Coiler1]] 09:51, 15 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
* If you think he's worth the trouble. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 14:47, 15 June 2008 (EDT) | |||
* Could you please provide citations for Darth Servo's nonsense instead of just placing them into the article on faith? The following are not actual positions of mine, or are distortions: | |||
*It also generously assumed that the asteroids were solid spheres of iron that were being vaporized, rather than loose collections of oblong or lumpy shaped rock. novelization. (Copying Stewart at SDI idiotic claim that the asteroids in TESB were soft and easily pulverized even though they survived collisions with metalic TIE fighters. {citation needed] | |||
*I would have to assume that a TL does not really vaporize anything using DET, but rather uses a technobabble mechanism to shunt matter into hyperspace. (Trektards on StarfleetJedi love to assume a passage in a Star Wars novel describing the superlaser giving planetary matter a "superluminal "boost"...into hyperspace" somehow lowers the energy requirements of the Death Star. They like to play these little word substitution games, replacing "boost" with "shunt" and pretend their reworded version is the canon. [citation needed] | |||
-- Mike | |||
:: I've PM'd Servo about it. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 15:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Thanks, Ted. The second part there is grossly distorted since I made a similar comment, but under the context of a joke over the continuing insistence of some Warsies on phasers being solely CR weapons. | |||
-- Mike | |||
Latest revision as of 16:07, 8 January 2009
Can I put in an entry for l33telboi in here? --Coiler1 09:51, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
- If you think he's worth the trouble. --Ted C 14:47, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
- Could you please provide citations for Darth Servo's nonsense instead of just placing them into the article on faith? The following are not actual positions of mine, or are distortions:
- It also generously assumed that the asteroids were solid spheres of iron that were being vaporized, rather than loose collections of oblong or lumpy shaped rock. novelization. (Copying Stewart at SDI idiotic claim that the asteroids in TESB were soft and easily pulverized even though they survived collisions with metalic TIE fighters. {citation needed]
- I would have to assume that a TL does not really vaporize anything using DET, but rather uses a technobabble mechanism to shunt matter into hyperspace. (Trektards on StarfleetJedi love to assume a passage in a Star Wars novel describing the superlaser giving planetary matter a "superluminal "boost"...into hyperspace" somehow lowers the energy requirements of the Death Star. They like to play these little word substitution games, replacing "boost" with "shunt" and pretend their reworded version is the canon. [citation needed]
-- Mike
- I've PM'd Servo about it. --Ted C 15:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Ted. The second part there is grossly distorted since I made a similar comment, but under the context of a joke over the continuing insistence of some Warsies on phasers being solely CR weapons. -- Mike